But organizers put the official recall launch on hold until August 1, due to “overwhelming public interest,” according to the press release. And, according to co-organizer Nathaniel Markowitz, they need more time to legally vet the statement in the application describing why they want a recall, which is limited to 200 words. At the event, organizers said the governor’s budget vetoes are not the sole reason they want to pursue a recall. But the vetoes were cited repeatedly. A group of about 100 Alaskans unhappy with Gov. Mike Dunleavy met at an Anchorage bookstore Monday to discuss launching a recall campaign. The event was originally intended to kick off the signature-gathering effort, which is being organized by a group now calling themselves “Recall Michael J. Dunleavy.” Meda DeWitt, who is volunteering as a spokesperson for the recall effort, speaks to the crowd at the Writer’s Block bookstore in Anchorage on July 15, 2019. (Photo by Elizabeth Harball/Alaska Public Media) Drummond did not say that she and and other Alaska lawmakers opposed to Dunleavy were discussing assisting the recall effort. “There’s a lot of remorse — buyer’s remorse,” Meda DeWitt, a spokesperson for the effort, said before the event. A political action committee called Future North registered with the state in February and is backing the recall effort. Its fundraising website reports raising about $6,900. Under Alaska statute, the grounds for a recall are lack of fitness, incompetence, neglect of duties or corruption. “This is a ruinous, economically devastating set of vetoes that this governor has handed down,” Mike Mason, another one of the co-organizers, told the crowd. “Now that we’ve come out in the public, there’s other recall efforts around the state who are coming forward as well, who, as we’re coming together as a group, would like to review it,” DeWitt said. DeWitt said there is also the matter of coming to a consensus. To apply, they must collect 28,501 signatures, or 10 percent of the number of voters in the last general election. To actually hold a recall, they would then need signatures from 25 percent of the number of voters in the last general election — that’s 71,252 signatures. “It’s so frustrating because we’re back to square one, we’re back to where we were on February 13 when he presented his budget for the first time,” Drummond said. Democratic Rep. Harriet Drummond, from Anchorage, attended the event and said she was planning on signing on. Aside from needing a solid legal case, organizers must jump through several more hoops before a recall can move forward. “We have no doubt that this is going to result in a legal fight, so it’s a matter of winnowing that statement of grounds down to our strongest 200 words,” Markowitz said. “I haven’t really talked with colleagues about it, but I wouldn’t be surprised if most of them signed up” she said.
Not all brands are ready to emulate media companies. Some are many steps away from operating with the flexibility that typifies the media companies. It takes a certain kind of staff to be able to deliver content at the level of the media company. Other brands outside of this industry struggle to understand what they’re doing wrong and why they can’t adapt. But make no mistake; they have other faults, too. They’re slow to change, listen and deviate from the company strategy. Again, the root of the problem here can be tied back to being inflexible.But media companies suffer no such hardships. They have systematically created content farms to pluck from They think with a journalistic mind geared toward marketing strategy and not sales. Media brands have an advantage in the sense that they’re able to tell better, more compelling stories as well.When it comes to operation management, it literally pays to model your company after the media companies and not the bland brands. Read the full article by Joe Pulizzi for more information on this topic.AddThis Sharing ButtonsShare to FacebookFacebookShare to TwitterTwitterShare to PrintPrintShare to EmailEmailShare to MoreAddThis